BitInsight
BitInsight

DAO Governance

2026-01-296 min read read

What Is a DAO

A DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) is an organization operated by smart contracts. Instead of a CEO or board of directors, token holders make decisions through voting.

Key characteristics:

  • Decentralized: No single authority
  • Autonomous: Rules executed by code
  • Transparent: All decisions on-chain

Most DeFi protocols are operated as DAOs.


Why DAOs

Problems with Traditional Organizations

  • Centralized decision-making
  • Opaque operations
  • Privileged minority stakeholders
  • Trust required

DAO Solutions

ProblemDAO Solution
CentralizationDistributed voting by token holders
OpacityOn-chain proposal/voting records
PrivilegeCodified rules
TrustSmart contract automatic execution

Governance Tokens

Concept

A governance token is a token representing decision-making rights in a protocol.

Major Governance Tokens:

  • UNI (Uniswap)
  • AAVE (Aave)
  • MKR (MakerDAO)
  • CRV (Curve)
  • COMP (Compound)

Powers

What token holders can do:

1. Proposal:

  • Propose protocol changes
  • Usually requires minimum token holdings

2. Voting:

  • Vote for/against proposals
  • Voting power proportional to token count

3. Delegation:

  • Delegate voting rights to another address
  • Delegates vote on behalf

Token Value

Value of governance tokens:

1. Protocol Control:

  • Fee rate decisions
  • Treasury usage
  • Protocol direction

2. Economic Benefits:

  • Fee distribution (some protocols)
  • Staking rewards
  • Airdrop eligibility

3. Speculation:

  • Future value expectations
  • Market supply/demand

Governance Process

General Flow

Idea → Forum Discussion → Snapshot Vote → On-chain Vote → Execution

1. Idea and Discussion

Forum:

  • Usually Discourse-based forums
  • Share draft ideas
  • Community feedback

Temperature Check:

  • Informal voting to gauge interest
  • Uses Snapshot, etc.

2. Formal Proposal

RFC (Request for Comments):

  • Write detailed proposal
  • Technical specifics
  • Impact analysis

Minimum Requirements:

  • Minimum token holdings to propose
  • Uniswap: 2.5M UNI
  • Compound: 100 COMP

3. Voting

Snapshot (Off-chain):

  • No gas fees
  • Vote with signature only
  • Not legally binding

On-chain Voting:

  • Actual transaction
  • Gas fees apply
  • Automatic execution

4. Execution

Timelock:

  • Waiting period after passage before execution
  • Usually 2~7 days
  • Time to detect malicious proposals

Automatic Execution:

  • Anyone can execute after timelock ends
  • Smart contract applies changes

Voting Mechanisms

1 Token 1 Vote (Token Voting)

The most basic method.

Characteristics:

  • More tokens = More voting power
  • Plutocracy concerns
  • Used by most DAOs

Quadratic Voting

Voting power = √(Number of tokens)

Characteristics:

  • Reduced influence of large holders
  • Increased influence of small participants
  • Vulnerable to Sybil attacks

Conviction Voting

Voting power increases over time.

Characteristics:

  • Favors long-term staking
  • Reduces short-term speculator influence
  • Complex mechanism

Delegated Voting

Delegate voting rights to experts.

Characteristics:

  • Reduced participation burden
  • Professional delegates emerge
  • Possible power concentration

Major Protocol Governance

MakerDAO

Token: MKR

Characteristics:

  • Oldest DeFi governance
  • Executive (Core Units) + MKR voting
  • Emergency shutdown authority

Decisions:

  • Add collateral types
  • Adjust stability fees
  • Set DAI Savings Rate (DSR)

Uniswap

Token: UNI

Characteristics:

  • 1B UNI issued (4-year distribution)
  • High proposal threshold (2.5M UNI)
  • Protocol fee switch inactive

Debates:

  • Whether to activate fees
  • License policy
  • Multi-chain deployment

Aave

Token: AAVE

Characteristics:

  • Safety Module (staking insurance)
  • Guardian (emergency powers)
  • 2-stage voting (Snapshot → On-chain)

Decisions:

  • Asset addition/parameters
  • Risk settings
  • Treasury usage

Curve

Token: CRV, veCRV

Characteristics:

  • Vote-Escrow: Lock CRV for up to 4 years → veCRV
  • Voting power proportional to lock duration
  • Gauge Weight voting

Curve Wars:

  • Gauge weight determines CRV incentive direction
  • Convex, Frax, etc. accumulate veCRV
  • Governance influence competition

Compound

Token: COMP

Characteristics:

  • Pioneer of liquidity mining
  • Simple governance structure
  • Guardian powers

How to Participate in Governance

1. Acquire Tokens

Methods:

  • Purchase on exchanges
  • Protocol usage rewards
  • Airdrops

2. Delegation

If direct voting is difficult, delegate.

Method:

  1. Choose a trustworthy delegate
  2. Delegate via protocol UI
  3. Can change/revoke anytime

Delegate Selection Criteria:

  • Voting history
  • Publicly stated values
  • Community reputation

3. Direct Voting

Process:

  1. Check proposals on forum
  2. Understand and evaluate content
  3. Vote on Snapshot/on-chain
  4. Pay gas (on-chain)

4. Write Proposals

Requirements:

  • Minimum token holdings
  • Prior forum discussion
  • Technical understanding

Governance Problems

1. Low Participation

Reality:

  • Most token holders don't vote
  • Participation rates around 5~10%
  • A few whales decide

Causes:

  • Apathy
  • Complex proposals
  • Gas fee burden
  • Irrelevant to personal interests

2. Plutocracy

Problem:

  • More tokens = More influence
  • Wealthy participants/VCs dominate
  • Centralization under "decentralization" banner

3. Vote Buying

Forms:

  • Direct token rental
  • Bribery platforms (Votium, etc.)
  • Compensation for proposal passage

4. Governance Attacks

Covered in detail in the next article.

5. Apathy

Problem:

  • Flood of unimportant proposals
  • Voter fatigue
  • Lack of meaningful change

Governance Best Practices

1. Information Accessibility

  • Easy-to-understand proposal summaries
  • Multi-language support
  • Educational materials

2. Active Delegation

  • Diverse delegate profiles
  • Delegate performance tracking
  • Delegation incentives

3. Staged Voting

  • Temperature check → Forum → Snapshot → On-chain
  • Feedback incorporated at each stage
  • Early filtering of bad proposals

4. Power Distribution

  • Diverse token distribution
  • Team/investor lock-ups
  • Small participant protection

Summary

DAOs are decentralized organizations operated by smart contracts, where governance token holders make decisions through voting. The process typically involves forum discussion → Snapshot voting → on-chain voting → timelock execution. Major DeFi protocols like MakerDAO, Uniswap, Aave, and Curve operate DAOs in their own ways. Various mechanisms exist including token-based voting, quadratic voting, and delegated voting. Issues like low participation, plutocracy, and governance attacks remain, but token holders can participate by voting directly or delegating to trusted delegates.

Next article: Governance Attacks - DAO Vulnerabilities